This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by ESBENSEN, F.-A. Articles by WINFREE, L. T. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Differences between Gang Girls and Gang Boys

Results from a Multisite Survey

University of Nebraska-Omaha

ELIZABETH PIPER DESCHENES

California State University-Long Beach

L. THOMAS WINFREE, Jr.

New Mexico State University

During the past decade, a growing body of literature examining gang girls and the involvement of girls in violence has appeared. In this article, we contribute to this developing literature by using data from a multisite evaluation to explore the extent to which gang girls are similar to or different from gang boys in terms of their attitudes, perceptions of their gangs, and their involvement in ganglike illegal activities. Findings indicate that gang girls are involved in a full array of illegal gang activities, although not as frequently as the gang boys. Whereas similarities exist in behavioral activities and in reasons for joining gangs, gang girls report greater social isolation from family and friends than do gang boys. The gang girls also report lower levels of self-esteem than do the boys. These gender differences are discussed in terms of differential developmental trajectories for boys and girls.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. C. Howell and A. Egley Jr. Moving Risk Factors into Developmental Theories of Gang Membership Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, October 1, 2005; 3(4): 334 - 354. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Stoolmiller and E. A. Blechman Substance Use is a Robust Predictor of Adolescent Recidivism Criminal Justice and Behavior, June 1, 2005; 32(3): 302 - 328. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. A. Hughes Studying Youth Gangs: Alternative Methods and Conclusions Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, May 1, 2005; 21(2): 98 - 119. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. D. Petersen and A. Valdez Using Snowball-Based Methods in Hidden Populations to Generate a Randomized Community Sample of Gang-Affiliated Adolescents Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, April 1, 2005; 3(2): 151 - 167. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. L. Talashek, N. Peragallo, K. Norr, and B. L. Dancy The Context of Risky Behaviors for Latino Youth J Transcult Nurs, April 1, 2004; 15(2): 131 - 138. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. J. HUEBNER and S. C. BETTS Exploring the Utility of Social Control Theory for Youth Development: Issues of Attachment, Involvement, and Gender Youth Society, December 1, 2002; 34(2): 123 - 145. [Abstract] [PDF]

				X. LI, B. STANTON, R. PACK, C. HARRIS, L. COTTRELL, and J. BURNS Risk and Protective Factors Associated with Gang Involvement among Urban African American Adolescents Youth Society, December 1, 2002; 34(2): 172 - 194. [Abstract] [PDF]